Professional Network Engagement Boost: Female Professionals Discover Better Results By Presenting as Men

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized professional network test this week after popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decline substantially.

The Method

  • Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
  • Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
  • Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."

April Mathis
April Mathis

Blockchain enthusiast and staking expert with over five years of experience in decentralized finance and crypto education.